https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:27913 Wed 14 Nov 2018 13:33:37 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:22681 weak. We compared these SJT predictions with identity management and hope for group advancement accounts that we deduced from social identity theory (SIT) which suggest that both system justification and support for social change will be significant when group interest is strong. Consistent with the SIT-based accounts, Study 1 (N = 116, Malaysia, M_age = 19.09 years) showed that strong identifiers were more concerned about their in-group’s reputation than weak identifiers, and that this concern increased system justification but only before an out-group audience to whom a need to present one’s group in good light is normally strong. Study 2 (N = 375, Australia, M_age = 23.59 years) conceptually replicated Study 1’s results and further revealed that strong identifiers justified the system due to the hope that their in-group status would improve in the future. Finally, Study 3 (N = 132, Germany, M_age = 20.34 years) revealed that system justification soothed anger and reduced support for social protest but only when group interest was strong (not weak). We did not find evidence in support of SJT predictions.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 17:13:46 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25308 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:34:22 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25462 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:19:27 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19251 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:01:16 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:26016 Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:03:18 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:26299 Wed 11 Apr 2018 11:50:48 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:22682 average position of members of intermediate-status groups, we reasoned that an indifference strategy would characterise perceivers’ competence vs. warmth judgements of these people because they do not possess features that deviate from normality. In contrast, high- and low-status groups deviate from normality, and we reasoned that attention to the negative aspects of their competence vs. warmness should enlist a complementary desire to compensate such groups on the opposite dimension, in line with societal norms of politeness. We tested these ideas in relation to people who were underweight (intermediate-status group), overweight (low-status group) and ideal weight (high-status group). Results from Study 1 showed that compensation was used for underweight faces and ideal weight faces, while an indifference strategy was used in the judgements of overweight faces, which we reasoned may be tied to cultural and individual differences. When these noise variables were removed in Studies 2a and 2b, we showed that, consistent with our assumptions, the indifference strategy was used in the evaluations of underweight people, and compensation was used for the ideal and overweight categories. Finally, Study 2b showed that norms of politeness predicted the use of compensation, but only for the overweight category.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 10:49:50 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54006 Wed 07 Feb 2024 15:21:35 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50024 Tue 27 Jun 2023 16:40:40 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:20062 Tue 14 Aug 2018 12:38:26 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:56045 Thu 25 Jul 2024 17:49:17 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:26689 Mon 26 Aug 2024 15:38:42 AEST ]]>